aboutgitcodebugslistschat
path: root/test/lib
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDavid Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>2026-05-11 20:03:19 +1000
committerStefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>2026-05-12 00:04:05 +0200
commit7bafe7163ab0bfafc3d90dcba06c1b045b57a285 (patch)
tree3504232b83524d06d71df6ae73488bf2f72c196b /test/lib
parenta82a2173d4ea41fe4e97d9451f8ed1626b00d612 (diff)
downloadpasst-7bafe7163ab0bfafc3d90dcba06c1b045b57a285.tar
passt-7bafe7163ab0bfafc3d90dcba06c1b045b57a285.tar.gz
passt-7bafe7163ab0bfafc3d90dcba06c1b045b57a285.tar.bz2
passt-7bafe7163ab0bfafc3d90dcba06c1b045b57a285.tar.lz
passt-7bafe7163ab0bfafc3d90dcba06c1b045b57a285.tar.xz
passt-7bafe7163ab0bfafc3d90dcba06c1b045b57a285.tar.zst
passt-7bafe7163ab0bfafc3d90dcba06c1b045b57a285.zip
clang-tidy: Suppress sscanf() warning harder
We already have a clang-tidy suppression to stop if complaining about our use of sscanf() in procfs_scan_listen(). However, it now (clang-tidy 22.1.4 or thereabouts) seems there's an additional warning category that complains about the same thing. Add that to the suppression. Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'test/lib')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions