diff options
| author | David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> | 2026-05-11 20:03:19 +1000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com> | 2026-05-12 00:04:05 +0200 |
| commit | 7bafe7163ab0bfafc3d90dcba06c1b045b57a285 (patch) | |
| tree | 3504232b83524d06d71df6ae73488bf2f72c196b | |
| parent | a82a2173d4ea41fe4e97d9451f8ed1626b00d612 (diff) | |
| download | passt-7bafe7163ab0bfafc3d90dcba06c1b045b57a285.tar passt-7bafe7163ab0bfafc3d90dcba06c1b045b57a285.tar.gz passt-7bafe7163ab0bfafc3d90dcba06c1b045b57a285.tar.bz2 passt-7bafe7163ab0bfafc3d90dcba06c1b045b57a285.tar.lz passt-7bafe7163ab0bfafc3d90dcba06c1b045b57a285.tar.xz passt-7bafe7163ab0bfafc3d90dcba06c1b045b57a285.tar.zst passt-7bafe7163ab0bfafc3d90dcba06c1b045b57a285.zip | |
clang-tidy: Suppress sscanf() warning harder
We already have a clang-tidy suppression to stop if complaining about our
use of sscanf() in procfs_scan_listen(). However, it now (clang-tidy
22.1.4 or thereabouts) seems there's an additional warning category that
complains about the same thing. Add that to the suppression.
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
| -rw-r--r-- | fwd.c | 3 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 1 deletions
@@ -599,7 +599,8 @@ static void procfs_scan_listen(int fd, unsigned int lstate, uint8_t *map) lineread_init(&lr, fd); lineread_get(&lr, &line); /* throw away header */ while (lineread_get(&lr, &line) > 0) { - /* NOLINTNEXTLINE(cert-err34-c): != 2 if conversion fails */ + /* != 2 if conversion fails */ + /* NOLINTNEXTLINE(bugprone-unchecked-string-to-number-conversion,cert-err34-c) */ if (sscanf(line, "%*u: %*x:%lx %*x:%*x %x", &port, &state) != 2) continue; |
