cppcheck: Work around some cppcheck 2.15.0 redundantInitialization warnings

cppcheck-2.15.0 has apparently broadened when it throws a warning about
redundant initialization to include some cases where we have an initializer
for some fields, but then set other fields in the function body.

This is arguably a false positive: although we are technically overwriting
the zero-initialization the compiler supplies for fields not explicitly
initialized, this sort of construct makes sense when there are some fields
we know at the top of the function where the initializer is, but others
that require more complex calculation.

That said, in the two places this shows up, it's pretty easy to work
around.  The results are arguably slightly clearer than what we had, since
they move the parts of the initialization closer together.

So do that rather than having ugly suppressions or dealing with the
tedious process of reporting a cppcheck false positive.

Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions