passt: Use NOLINT clang-tidy block instead of NOLINTNEXTLINE

For some reason, this is only reported by clang-tidy 19.1.2 on
Alpine:

/home/sbrivio/passt/passt.c:314:53: error: conditional operator with identical true and false expressions [bugprone-branch-clone,-warnings-as-errors]
  314 |         nfds = epoll_wait(c.epollfd, events, EPOLL_EVENTS, TIMER_INTERVAL);
      |                                                            ^

We do have a suppression, but not on the line preceding it, because
we also need a cppcheck suppression there. Use NOLINTBEGIN/NOLINTEND
for the clang-tidy suppression.

Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/passt.c b/passt.c
index eaf231d..fac6101 100644
--- a/passt.c
+++ b/passt.c
@@ -309,9 +309,10 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 	timer_init(&c, &now);
 
 loop:
-	/* NOLINTNEXTLINE(bugprone-branch-clone): intervals can be the same */
+	/* NOLINTBEGIN(bugprone-branch-clone): intervals can be the same */
 	/* cppcheck-suppress [duplicateValueTernary, unmatchedSuppression] */
 	nfds = epoll_wait(c.epollfd, events, EPOLL_EVENTS, TIMER_INTERVAL);
+	/* NOLINTEND(bugprone-branch-clone) */
 	if (nfds == -1 && errno != EINTR)
 		die_perror("epoll_wait() failed in main loop");