From 8bd57bf25bab5ad14bd43242558243b20b49f80e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 10:43:07 +1000
Subject: doc: Trivial fix for reuseaddr-priority
This test program checks for particular behaviour regardless of order of
operations. So, we step through the test with all possible orders for
a number of different of parts. Or at least, we're supposed to, a copy
pasta error led to using the same order for two things which should be
independent.
Fixes: 299c40750137 ("doc: Add program to document and test assumptions about SO_REUSEADDR")
Reported-by: David Taylor <davidt@yadt.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
---
doc/platform-requirements/reuseaddr-priority.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/doc/platform-requirements/reuseaddr-priority.c b/doc/platform-requirements/reuseaddr-priority.c
index 644553f..701b6ff 100644
--- a/doc/platform-requirements/reuseaddr-priority.c
+++ b/doc/platform-requirements/reuseaddr-priority.c
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ static void check_all_orders(void)
for (k = 0; k < norders; k++)
for (l = 0; l < norders; l++)
check_one_order(orders[i], orders[j],
- orders[j], orders[l]);
+ orders[k], orders[l]);
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
--
cgit v1.2.3