aboutgitcodebugslistschat
path: root/test/run
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* test: Split cppcheck and clang-tidy tests into different filesDavid Gibson2022-08-201-1/+2
| | | | | | | | | | Both clang-tidy and cppcheck linting are handled by the same test file, test/build/static_checkers. The two linters are independent of each other though, and each one takes quite a long time. Split them into separate files to make it easier to control which are executed from the top level test script. Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
* tests: Explicitly list test files in test/run, remove "onlyfor" supportDavid Gibson2022-07-141-27/+31
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently test/run uses wildcards to run all of the tests in a directory. However, that wildcard list is filtered down by the "onlyfor" directives in the test files... usually to a single file. Therefore, just explicitly list the files we *really* want to run for this test mode. This makes it easier to see at the top level what tests will be executed, and to change that list temporarily while debugging specific failures. This means the "onlyfor" directive no longer has any purpose, and we can remove it. "onlyfor" was also the only used of the $MODE variable, so we can remove that too. Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
* tests: Don't automatically traverse directories of test filesDavid Gibson2022-07-141-24/+24
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The top level listing control of which tests to run is in test/run, however it uses the test() function which runs an entire directory of test files, filtered by some criteria. This makes it awkward to narrow down to a subset of tests when debugging a specific failure. To make this easier, have test() take an explicit list of test files to run, and have the caller in test/run handle the directory traversal. The construct we use for this is pretty awkward to handle the fact that we're in the source tree root directory rather than test/ at this point in test/run. Later cleanups will improve that. Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
* test/run: Return 0 from run(), exit value already reflects failuresStefano Brivio2022-05-191-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | There's no need to return non-zero if there have been failures in run(), because the exit value is already determined from the number of failures reported in the log file. Return zero, so that this doesn't cause the script to fail, given we now run it with -e. Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
* tests: Don't ignore errors during scriptDavid Gibson2022-05-191-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Most commands issued during the testing scripts aren't explicitly checked for errors. Therefore, if they fail, the shell will just keep on executing. This makes it difficult to figure out where things started going wrong if things fall over. Run the whole script with the set -e mode so that it will exit in the case of any (unchecked) failing command. To make this work we do need to add explicit checks / fallbacks for some commands which we expect to fail. Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> [sbrivio: use sh -e instead of setting -e later, so that we don't miss anything before set -e is issued] Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
* tests: Remove unused XVFB variableDavid Gibson2022-05-191-3/+0
| | | | | | | The XVFB variable is initialized at the beginning of test/run then never used again. I'm assuming it's a leftover from some ealier iteration. Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
* test, seccomp, Makefile: Switch to valgrind runs for passt functional testsStefano Brivio2022-03-291-0/+9
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Pass to seccomp.sh a list of additional syscalls valgrind needs as EXTRA_SYSCALLS in a new 'valgrind' make target, and add corresponding support in seccomp.sh itself. In test setup functions, start passt with valgrind, but not for performance tests. Add tests checking that valgrind exits without errors after all the other tests in the group are done. Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
* demo, ci: Switch to asciinema(1) for terminal recordingsStefano Brivio2022-02-221-8/+8
| | | | | | | | | | For demos, cool-retro-term(1) looked fancier, but several threads of that and ffmpeg(1) are just messing up with performance testing. The CI videos started getting really big as well, and they were difficult to read. Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
* test: Add demo for Podman with pastaStefano Brivio2022-02-221-0/+8
| | | | | | | | ...showing setup steps, some peculiarities as --net option, and a general side-to-side comparison with slirp4netns(1), including "quick" TCP and UDP throughput and latency benchmarks. Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
* test: Add distribution tests for several architectures and kernel versionsStefano Brivio2022-01-281-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The new tests check build and a simple case with pasta sending a short message in both directions (namespace to init, init to namespace). Tests cover a mix of Debian, Fedora, OpenSUSE and Ubuntu combinations on aarch64, i386, ppc64, ppc64le, s390x, x86_64. Builds tested starting from approximately glibc 2.19, gcc 4.7, and actual functionality approximately from 4.4 kernels, glibc 2.25, gcc 4.8, all the way up to current glibc/gcc/kernel versions. Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
* test: Record CI and demo videos in Xvfb by default, fix demo setup sequenceStefano Brivio2021-09-291-1/+6
| | | | Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
* test: Add CI/demo scriptsStefano Brivio2021-09-271-0/+154
Not really quick, definitely dirty. Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>