| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Harmless except for two bad debugging prints.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The existing sizes provide no measurable differences in throughput
and packet rates at this point. They were probably needed as batched
implementations were not complete, but they can be decreased quite a
bit now.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Implement a packet abstraction providing boundary and size checks
based on packet descriptors: packets stored in a buffer can be queued
into a pool (without storage of its own), and data can be retrieved
referring to an index in the pool, specifying offset and length.
Checks ensure data is not read outside the boundaries of buffer and
descriptors, and that packets added to a pool are within the buffer
range with valid offset and indices.
This implies a wider rework: usage of the "queueing" part of the
abstraction mostly affects tap_handler_{passt,pasta}() functions and
their callees, while the "fetching" part affects all the guest or tap
facing implementations: TCP, UDP, ICMP, ARP, NDP, DHCP and DHCPv6
handlers.
Suggested-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We can't take for granted that the hard limit for open files is
big enough as to allow to delay closing sockets to a timer.
Store the value of RTLIMIT_NOFILE we set at start, and use it to
understand if we're approaching the limit with pending, spliced
TCP connections. If that's the case, close sockets right away as
soon as they're not needed, instead of deferring this task to a
timer.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This should never happen, but there are no formal guarantees: ensure
socket numbers are below SOCKET_MAX.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
|
|
|
Using events and flags instead of states makes the implementation
much more straightforward: actions are mostly centered on events
that occurred on the connection rather than states.
An example is given by the ESTABLISHED_SOCK_FIN_SENT and
FIN_WAIT_1_SOCK_FIN abominations: we don't actually care about
which side started closing the connection to handle closing of
connection halves.
Split out the spliced implementation, as it has very little in
common with the "regular" TCP path.
Refactor things here and there to improve clarity. Add helpers
to trace where resets and flag settings come from.
No functional changes intended.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
|
