aboutgitcodebugslistschat
path: root/port_fwd.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* port_fwd, util: Include additional headers to fix build with muslStefano Brivio2023-12-021-0/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | lseek() is declared in unistd.h, and stdio.h provides sscanf(). Include these two headers in port_fwd.c. SIGCHLD, even if used exclusively for clone(), is defined in signal.h: add the include to util.h, as NS_CALL needs it. Reported-by: lemmi <lemmi@nerd2nerd.org> Link: https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/actions/runs/6999782606/job/19039526604#step:7:57 Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
* port_fwd, util: Don't bind UDP ports with opposite-side bound TCP portsStefano Brivio2023-11-221-8/+19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When pasta periodically scans bound ports and binds them on the other side in order to forward traffic, we bind UDP ports for corresponding TCP port numbers, too, to support protocols and applications such as iperf3 which use UDP port numbers matching the ones used by the TCP data connection. If we scan UDP ports in order to bind UDP ports, we skip detection of the UDP ports we already bound ourselves, to avoid looping back our own ports. Same with scanning and binding TCP ports. But if we scan for TCP ports in order to bind UDP ports, we need to skip bound TCP ports too, otherwise, as David pointed out: - we find a bound TCP port on side A, and bind the corresponding TCP and UDP ports on side B - at the next periodic scan, we find that UDP port bound on side B, and we bind the corresponding UDP port on side A - at this point, we unbind that UDP port on side B: we would otherwise loop back our own port. To fix this, we need to avoid binding UDP ports that we already bound, on the other side, as a consequence of finding a corresponding bound TCP port. Reproducing this issue is straightforward: ./pasta -- iperf3 -s # Wait one second, then from another terminal: iperf3 -c ::1 -u Reported-by: Akihiro Suda <akihiro.suda.cz@hco.ntt.co.jp> Analysed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> Fixes: 457ff122e33c ("udp,pasta: Periodically scan for ports to automatically forward") Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
* port_fwd: Don't try to read bound ports from invalid file handlesStefano Brivio2023-11-071-0/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This is a minimal fix for what would be reported by Coverity as "Improper use of negative value" (CWE-394): port_fwd_init() doesn't guarantee that all the pre-opened file handles are actually valid. We should probably warn on failing open() and open_in_ns() in port_fwd_init(), too, but that's outside the scope of this minimal fix. Before commit 5a0485425bc9 ("port_fwd: Pre-open /proc/net/* files rather than on-demand"), we used to have a single open() call and a check after it. Fixes: 5a0485425bc9 ("port_fwd: Pre-open /proc/net/* files rather than on-demand") Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
* port_fwd: Simplify get_bound_ports_*() to port_fwd_scan_*()David Gibson2023-11-071-34/+16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | get_bound_ports_*() now only use their context and ns parameters to determine which forwarding maps they're operating on. Each function needs the map they're actually updating, as well as the map for the other direction, to avoid creating forwarding loops. The UDP function also requires the corresponding TCP map, to implement the behaviour where we forward UDP ports of the same number as bound TCP ports for tools like iperf3. Passing those maps directly as parameters simplifies the code without making the callers life harder, because those already know the relevant maps. IMO, invoking these functions in terms of where they're looking for updated forwarding also makes more logical sense than in terms of where they're looking for bound ports. Given that new way of looking at the functions, also rename them to port_fwd_scan_*(). Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
* port_fwd: Move port scanning /proc fds into struct port_fwdDavid Gibson2023-11-071-30/+32
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently we store /proc/net fds used to implement automatic port forwarding in the proc_net_{tcp,udp} fields of the main context structure. However, in fact each of those is associated with a particular direction of forwarding, and we already have struct port_fwd which collects all other information related to a particular direction of port forwarding. We can simplify things a bit by moving the /proc fds into struct port_fwd. Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
* port_fwd: Split TCP and UDP cases for get_bound_ports()David Gibson2023-11-071-33/+43
| | | | | | | | | | | | Currently get_bound_ports() takes a parameter to determine if it scans for UDP or TCP bound ports, but in fact there's almost nothing in common between those two paths. The parameter appears primarily to have been a convenience for when we needed to invoke this function via NS_CALL(). Now that we don't need that, split it into separate TCP and UDP versions. Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
* port_fwd: Don't NS_CALL get_bound_ports()David Gibson2023-11-071-35/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | When we want to scan for bound ports in the namespace we use NS_CALL() to run get_bound_ports() in the namespace. However, the only thing it actually needed to be in the namespace for was to open the /proc/net file it was scanning. Since we now always pre-open those, we no longer need to switch to the namespace for the actual get_bound_ports() calls. That in turn means that tcp_port_detect() doesn't need to run in the ns either, and we can just replace it with inline calls to get_bound_ports(). Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
* port_fwd: Pre-open /proc/net/* files rather than on-demandDavid Gibson2023-11-071-18/+24
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | procfs_scan_listen() can either use an already opened fd for a /proc/net file, or it will open it. So, effectively it will open the file on the first call, then re-use the fd in subsequent calls. However, it's not possible to open the /proc/net files after we isolate our filesystem in isolate_prefork(). That means that for each /proc/net file we must call procfs_scan_listen() at least once before isolate_prefork(), or it won't work afterwards. That happens to be the case, but it's a pretty fragile requirement. To make this more robust, instead always pre-open the /proc files we will need in get_bounds_port_init() and have procfs_scan_listen() just use those. Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
* port_fwd: Better parameterise procfs_scan_listen()David Gibson2023-11-071-31/+24
| | | | | | | | | | | | | procfs_scan_listen() does some slightly clunky logic to deduce the fd it wants to use, the path it wants to open and the state it's looking for based on parameters for protocol, IP version and whether we're in the namespace. However, the caller already has to make choices based on similar parameters so it can just pass in the things that procfs_scan_listen() needs directly. Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
* port_fwd: Move automatic port forwarding code to port_fwd.[ch]David Gibson2023-11-071-0/+179
The implementation of scanning /proc files to do automatic port forwarding is a bit awkwardly split between procfs_scan_listen() in util.c, get_bound_ports() and related functions in conf.c and the initial setup code in conf(). Consolidate all of this into port_fwd.h, which already has some related definitions, and a new port_fwd.c. Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>