| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When forwarding a datagram to a socket, we need to find a socket with a
suitable local address to send it. Currently we keep track of such sockets
in an array indexed by local port, but this can't properly handle cases
where we have multiple local addresses in active use.
For "spliced" (socket to socket) cases, improve this by instead opening
a socket specifically for the target side of the flow. We connect() as
well as bind()ing that socket, so that it will only receive the flow's
reply packets, not anything else. We direct datagrams sent via that socket
using the addresses from the flow table, effectively replacing bespoke
addressing logic with the unified logic in fwd.c
When we create the flow, we also take a duplicate of the originating
socket, and use that to deliver reply datagrams back to the origin, again
using addresses from the flow table entry.
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
|
|
|
sock_l4() creates a socket of the given IP protocol number, and adds it to
the epoll state. Currently it determines the correct tag for the epoll
data based on the protocol. However, we have some future cases where we
might want different semantics, and therefore epoll types, for sockets of
the same protocol. So, change sock_l4() to take the epoll type as an
explicit parameter, and determine the protocol from that.
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
|
