tcp: Unconditionally force ACK for all !SYN, !RST packets2024_03_26.4988e2b

Currently we set ACK on flags packets only when the acknowledged byte
pointer has advanced, or we hadn't previously set a window.  This means
in particular that we can send a window update with no ACK flag, which
doesn't appear to be correct.  RFC 9293 requires a receiver to ignore such
a packet [0], and indeed it appears that every non-SYN, non-RST packet
should have the ACK flag.

The reason for the existing logic, rather than always forcing an ACK seems
to be to avoid having the packet mistaken as a duplicate ACK which might
trigger a fast retransmit.  However, earlier tests in the function mean we
won't reach here if we don't have either an advance in the ack pointer -
which will already set the ACK flag, or a window update - which shouldn't
trigger a fast retransmit.

[0] https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc9293.html#section-3.10.7.4-2.5.2.1

Link: https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/22146
Link: https://bugs.passt.top/show_bug.cgi?id=84
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/tcp.c b/tcp.c
index b65ddeb..28562b7 100644
--- a/tcp.c
+++ b/tcp.c
@@ -1593,8 +1593,6 @@ static void tcp_update_seqack_from_tap(const struct ctx *c,
  */
 static int tcp_send_flag(struct ctx *c, struct tcp_tap_conn *conn, int flags)
 {
-	uint32_t prev_ack_to_tap = conn->seq_ack_to_tap;
-	uint32_t prev_wnd_to_tap = conn->wnd_to_tap;
 	struct tcp4_l2_flags_buf_t *b4 = NULL;
 	struct tcp6_l2_flags_buf_t *b6 = NULL;
 	struct tcp_info tinfo = { 0 };
@@ -1675,9 +1673,7 @@ static int tcp_send_flag(struct ctx *c, struct tcp_tap_conn *conn, int flags)
 		*data++ = OPT_WS_LEN;
 		*data++ = conn->ws_to_tap;
 	} else if (!(flags & RST)) {
-		if (conn->seq_ack_to_tap != prev_ack_to_tap ||
-		    !prev_wnd_to_tap)
-			flags |= ACK;
+		flags |= ACK;
 	}
 
 	th->doff = (sizeof(*th) + optlen) / 4;