passt/contrib, branch 2022_09_01.7ce9fd1

fedora: Add selinux-policy Requires: tag

2022-09-02T16:03:57+00:00

fedora-review says:

  Note: Directories without known owners:
  /usr/share/selinux/packages/passt, /usr/share/doc/passt,
  /usr/share/selinux, /usr/share/selinux/packages

and selinux-policy owns those two last ones.

While at it, split Requires: tags also for post and preun actions
onto different lines, for consistency.

Reported-by: Daniel P. Berrangé 
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio

fedora: Add %dir entries for own SELinux policy directory and documentation

2022-09-02T15:55:23+00:00

fedora-review says:

  Note: No known owner of /usr/share/selinux/packages/passt,
  /usr/share/doc/passt

While at it, replace "passt" by "%{name}" in a few places for
consistency.

Reported-by: Daniel P. Berrangé 
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio

podman, slirp4netns.sh: Use --netns option on pasta's command line

2022-08-30T17:43:31+00:00

...instead of PATH. This seems to be the only change needed in
existing pasta integrations after patch:

  Use explicit --netns option rather than multiplexing with PID

Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio 
Reviewed-by: David Gibson

contrib: Rebase Podman patch to latest upstream

2022-08-30T17:43:31+00:00

Trivial conflicts in man pages only.

Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio

fedora: Pass explicit bindir, mandir, docdir, and drop OpenSUSE override

2022-08-30T17:17:48+00:00

Fedora's parameters currently match the ones from the Makefile (which
is based on GNU recommendations), but that's not necessarily
guaranteed.

This should make the OpenSUSE Tumbleweed override for docdir
unnecessary: drop it.

Suggested-by: Daniel P. Berrangé 
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio

fedora: Use full versioning for SELinux subpackage Requires: tag

2022-08-30T17:16:44+00:00

...as recommended in:
  https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_requiring_base_package

Reported-by: Daniel P. Berrangé 
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio

fedora: Define git_hash in spec file and reuse it

2022-08-30T17:16:44+00:00

...as it's used twice. The short version, however, appears hardcoded
only once in the output, and it comes straight from the rpkg macro
building the version string -- leave that macro as it is.

Suggested-by: Daniel P. Berrangé 
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio

fedora: Drop comment stating the spec file is an example file

2022-08-30T17:16:44+00:00

...as this ends up in the actual spec file.

Suggested-by: Daniel P. Berrangé 
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio

fedora: Drop SPDX identifier from spec file

2022-08-30T17:16:44+00:00

...which makes it fall under MIT licensing terms. Daniel reports that
it's very unusual for spec files to contain explicit licensing terms
and might cause minor inconveniences later on, on mass changes to
spec files.

I originally added licensing information using SPDX identifiers to
make the project fully compliant with the REUSE Specification 3.0
(https://reuse.software/spec/), but there are anyway a few more files
not including explicit licensing information. It might be worth to
fix that later on, in any case.

Suggested-by: Daniel P. Berrangé 
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio

fedora: Adopt versioning guideline for snapshots

2022-08-30T17:16:01+00:00

The "Simple versioning" scheme:
  https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Versioning/#_simple_versioning

probably doesn't apply to passt, given that upstream git tags are
not really releases. Switch to the "Snapshots" versioning scheme:
  https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Versioning/#_snapshots

Suggested-by: Daniel P. Berrangé 
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio